I believe using markup languages would be a better approach than getting some new character. 2015/10/12 4:27 "William_J_G Overington" <wjgo_10...@btinternet.com>:
> Please note that I am on moderated post, so if this post does get sent to > the Unicode mailing list it will be because the moderator has kindly agreed > to it being circulated. > > I have recently made significant progress with my research in > communication through the language barrier. The capabilities are > greatly improved. > > On 7 October 2015 I submitted a document, hoping that it would become > included in the Unicode Document Register. > > I have been informed that a group of people have examined the document and > determined that it is out of scope for UTC. > > I am not seeking to question that decision. > > As an independent researcher, not representing an organization, nor in > fact employed by any organization at all, I am trying to get the system > standardized as an international standard. > > I feel that trying to produce first a widely-used system using a Private > Use Area encoding is not a realistic practical goal and even if it were > practical the result would be lots of legacy data. I feel that to become > successful the system needs standardization and implementation to go > forward together. > > So what to do? > > More generally, how are the format and the encoding of tagspaces to be > carried out in the future? > > The document is available on the web at the present time in two places. > > There is a file available for download as an attachment in a forum post of > 8 October 2015 in the High-Logic Gallery forum. > > Adding a direct link to the post is not at present possible using the > particular email system that I am using. > > There is direct access in my family webspace. > > www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~ngo/two_tagspaces.pdf > > In addition I have deposited the document at the British Library. > > William Overington > > 10 October 2015 > > >