Hi Frédéric, The historic use of ideographic numbers for marking Go moves are discussed in the latest draft of my document:
http://www.babelstone.co.uk/Unicode/GoNotation.pdf Andrew On 16 March 2016 at 13:35, Frédéric Grosshans <frederic.grossh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Le 15/03/2016 22:21, Andrew West a écrit : >> >> >> Possibly. I certainly have very little expectation that a proposal to >> complete both sets to 999 (or even 399) would have any chance of >> success. > > And then, there are also the historical example of ideographic numbers used > for the same purpose in historic texts (like here > http://sns.91ddcc.com/t/54057, here http://pmgs.kongfz.com/item_pic_464349/ > or here > http://www.weibo.com/p/1001593905063666976890?from=page_100106_profile&wvr=6&mod=wenzhangmod > ). > > The above has been found with a quick google search, and I have no idea > whether these symbols were used in the running text or not. > > Frédéric >
