It forbids sale of the font by itself. (I'm aware the FSF thinks there's a loophole by bundling "hello world", but I don't think this would hold up in court.)
On Saturday, October 08, 2016 11:50:40 PM Shriramana Sharma wrote: > Interested to know why you think OFL is non-free... > > On 9 Oct 2016 05:18, "Luke Dashjr" <l...@dashjr.org> wrote: > > On Saturday, October 08, 2016 5:57:41 PM James Kass wrote: > > > Google and Monotype unveil The Noto Project's unified font for all > > > languages: > > > https://techcrunch.com/2016/10/06/google-and-monotype-> > > > unveil-the-noto-proje > > > > > cts-unified-font-for-all-languages/ > > > > It's unfortunate they released it under the non-free OFL license. :(