Well, see my follow-up to James Kass and evaluate the merits of the two choices. Do generic font makers intend to support both graphic terminal emulation and chess? Should chess font makers be burdened with graphic terminal emulation glyphs they know nothing about?
> On 6 Apr 2017, at 01:31, Kent Karlsson <kent.karlsso...@telia.com> wrote: > > > Exactly. > > /K > > Den 2017-04-06 01:25, skrev "Michael Everson" <ever...@evertype.com>: > >> 2581 FE00; Chessboard box drawing; # LOWER ONE EIGHTH BLOCK >> 258F FE00; Chessboard box drawing; # LEFT ONE EIGHTH BLOCK >> 2594 FE00; Chessboard box drawing; # UPPER ONE EIGHTH BLOCK >> 2595 FE00; Chessboard box drawing; # RIGHT ONE EIGHTH BLOCK >> 2596 FE00; Chessboard box drawing; # QUADRANT LOWER LEFT >> 2597 FE00; Chessboard box drawing; # QUADRANT LOWER RIGHT >> 2598 FE00; Chessboard box drawing; # QUADRANT UPPER LEFT >> 259D FE00; Chessboard box drawing; # QUADRANT UPPER RIGHT >> >> I guess I see your point. It does no harm, especially if the font might >> possibly be used for graphics terminal emulation. ;-) > >
