> Michael Everson <[email protected]> hat am 6. April 2017 um 14:57 > geschrieben: > >> That's what this proposal is all about. It's a good and sound proposal, >> except for the empty square. > > Do you mean “except for the light and dark squares without a piece on them” or > “except for the light square without a piece on it”?
I meant "except for the squares without a piece on them". > What is your specific counter-proposal? Either VS-16 and Emoji property for pieces, being used with U+2B1B/C as empty squares, as explained in a subsequent message, or VS-1 and VS-2 sequences with a single codepoint to represent an empty square (consistent with pieces).
