On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 10:30:17 +0100 (CET), I wrote: > […] I now believe and will > spread the word that […] on the other > hand, the recommendations in TUS may be considered a mere official discourse > for > encoding process management purposes, but with little through no real impact > on > actual practice. http://www.unicode.org/mail-arch/unicode-ml/y2017-m01/0119.html
That had little of a real intent, and much of a formatted discourse—thus a kind of not fully accurate uttering—intended to make aware that untrue statements made on behalf of some entity worsen the image of that entity and lessen the overall reliability of related products. In this specific context, I believed that an overstating shortcut could have the most impact. It was foreseeable that the weapons used by the UTC would be returned against themselves at some point. Having said that, I still always try to overcome and to make the best of the existing, e.g. by providing a facility for input of some most useful Latin superscript small letters along with the other hard-to-access characters of the target locale. Regards, Marcel
