On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 12:27 AM, Karl Pentzlin <[email protected]> wrote:
> For me, the glyph looks like the proposed and accepted U+2BF0 ERIS FORM ONE > (see pipeline; proposed as U+2BBA in L2/16-173R). > That's a perfect graphical match. I propose an annotation "Also an early IBM invalid character symbol". > - Karl > > -- > Am Dienstag, 26. September 2017 um 06:48 schrieb Leo Broukhis via Unicode: > > >> Wikipedia > >> (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_1620#Invalid_character) > >> describes the "invalid character" symbol (see attachment) as a > >> Cyrillic Ж which it obviously is not. > > >> But what is it? Does it deserve encoding, or is it a glyph > >> variation of an existing codepoint? > >
