Re: Non-RGI sequences are not emoji? (was: Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10))

[Doug Ewell via Unicode]

On January 5, Mark Davis wrote:

Doug, I modified my working draft, at
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EuNjbs0XrBwqlvCJxra44o3EVrwdBJUWsPf8Ec1fWKY

If that looks ok, I'll submit.

Sorry for the delay. The text substitutions look fine.

--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org