On 18 Jan 2018, at 08:21, Andre Schappo via Unicode <unicode@unicode.org<mailto:unicode@unicode.org>> wrote:
On 16 Jan 2018, at 08:00, Richard Wordingham via Unicode <unicode@unicode.org<mailto:unicode@unicode.org>> wrote: On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 20:16:21 -0800 James Kass via Unicode <unicode@unicode.org<mailto:unicode@unicode.org>> wrote: It will probably be the ASCII apostrophe. The stated intent favors the apostrophe over diacritics or special characters to ensure that the language can be input to computers with standard keyboards. Typing U+0027 into a word processor takes planning. Of the three, it should obviously be the modifier letter U+02BC, but I think what gets stored will be U+0027 or the single quotation mark U+2019. However, we shouldn't overlook the diacritic mark U+0315 COMBINING COMMA ABOVE RIGHT. Richard. I have just tested twitter hashtags and as one would expect, U+02BC does not break hashtags. See twitter.com/andreschappo/status/953903964722024448<http://twitter.com/andreschappo/status/953903964722024448> ...and, just in case twitter.com/andreschappo/status/953944089896083456<http://twitter.com/andreschappo/status/953944089896083456> <https://twitter.com/andreschappo/status/953944089896083456> André Schappo
