Anshuman Pandey wrote: > I think it’s a good time to end this conversation. Whether ‘nonsense’ or not, > emoji are here and they’re in Unicode. This conversation has itself become > nonsense, d’y’all agree?
No. Other than the part about emoji being here and in Unicode. > The amount of time that people have spent on this discussion could’ve been > directed towards work on any one of the unencoded scripts listed at: > > http://www.linguistics.berkeley.edu/sei/scripts-not-encoded.html https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_work_and_no_play_makes_Jack_a_dull_boy