|
On 11/1/2018 7:59 PM, James Kass via
Unicode wrote:
Alphabetic script users' handwriting does not match print in all features. Traditional German handwriting used a line like a macron over the letter 'u' to distinguish it from 'n'. Rendering this with a u-macron in print would be the height of absurdity. I feel similarly about the assertion that the "two lines" are something that needs to be encoded, but only an expert would know for sure. A./ |
- Re: second attempt Ken Whistler via Unicode
- Re: A sign/abbreviation for "magi... James Kass via Unicode
- Re: A sign/abbreviation for "magi... Janusz S. Bień via Unicode
- Re: A sign/abbreviation for "magi... Asmus Freytag via Unicode
- Re: A sign/abbreviation for "magi... Janusz S. Bień via Unicode
- Re: A sign/abbreviation for "magi... Asmus Freytag via Unicode
- Re: A sign/abbreviation for "magi... Janusz S. Bień via Unicode
- Re: A sign/abbreviation for "magi... Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: A sign/abbreviation for "magi... James Kass via Unicode
- Re: A sign/abbreviation for "magi... James Kass via Unicode
- Re: A sign/abbreviation for "magi... Asmus Freytag via Unicode
- Re: A sign/abbreviation for "magi... James Kass via Unicode
- Re: A sign/abbreviation for "magi... Julian Bradfield via Unicode
- Re: A sign/abbreviation for "magi... James Kass via Unicode
- Re: A sign/abbreviation for "magi... James Kass via Unicode
- Re: A sign/abbreviation for "magi... Asmus Freytag via Unicode
- Re: A sign/abbreviation for "magi... Marcel Schneider via Unicode
- Re: A sign/abbreviation for "magi... Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: A sign/abbreviation for "magi... Marcel Schneider via Unicode
- Re: A sign/abbreviation for "magi... Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: A sign/abbreviation for "magi... Philippe Verdy via Unicode

