Re: A last missing link for interoperable representation

[Asmus Freytag via Unicode]

On 1/8/2019 1:11 PM, James Kass via Unicode wrote: Asmus Freytag wrote, > ... > (for an extreme example there's an orthography > out there that uses @ as a letter -- we know that > won't work well with email addresses and duplicate > encoding of the @ shape is a complete non-starter). Everything's a non-starter.  Until it begins. It's a non-starter because of the security-sensitive nature of @. Is this a casing orthography?  (Please see attached image.) We've seen where typewriter kludges enabled users to represent the glottal stop with a question mark (or a digit seven).  Unicode makes those kludges unnecessary. But we're still using typewriter kludges to represent stress in Latin script because there is no Unicode plain text solution.