On Sat, 9 Feb 2019 04:52:30 -0800 David Starner via Unicode <unicode@unicode.org> wrote:
> Note that this is actually the only thing that stands out to me in > Unicode not supporting older character sets; in PETSCII (Commodore > 64), the high-bit character characters were the reverse (in this > sense) of the low-bit characters. Later ISCII has some styling codes, bold and italic amongst them. Richard.
