Egmont,

On 2/9/2019 11:48 AM, Egmont Koblinger via Unicode wrote:
Are there any (non-CJK) scripts for which crossword puzzles don't exist?

There are crossword puzzles for Hindi (in the Devanagari script). Just do an image search for "Hindi crossword puzzle".

But the conventions for these break up words into syllables fitting into the boxes, and the rules for that are complex. You have to allow for the placement of dependent vowels, which may take up extra space left or right, as well as consonant clusters, which would be expressed often as conjuncts in Sanskrit, but which in Hindi are more commonly rendered as dead consonant sequences. So the "stuff in a box" is:

1. Inherently proportional width.

2. Inherently multi-character in content. (underlying 1 to 3 or more characters per cell)

This is the kind of compromise you would have to have to make for almost any Indic script, to enable a rational approach to building crossword puzzles that make sense.

And in a terminal context, you probably would not get acceptable behavior for Hindi if you tried to just take all the "stuff in a box" chunks and tried to lay them out directly in a line, as if the script behaved more like CJK.

The existence proof of techniques to cut up text into syllables that enable crossword puzzle building, is not the same as a determination that the script, ipso facto, would work in a terminal context without dealing with additional complex script issues.

At any rate, this is once again straying over into the issue of whether terminals canĀ  be adapted for the requirements of shaping rules for complex scripts -- rather than the nominal subject of the thread, which has to do with bidi text layout in terminals.

--Ken


Reply via email to