The Wikipedia page states, U+0310 is a general-purpose combining diacritical mark. I would treat it similar like U+0308 (COMBINING DIAERESIS) or U+030C (COMBINING CARON), which are both characters with multiple names and different meanings depending on the script and the language. The main benefit of these general-purpose combining diacritical marks is, that they can be applied to many characters if needed. I don’t think, it is a good idea to remove this versatility. At least one example exists, where someone used the combining candrabindu for a constructed language as the upside-down counterpart to the combining fermata. http://randomguy32.de/conlang/000/writing/
Best regards, Marius Am Do., 18 Apr 2019 20:59:53 +0100 schrieb Richard Wordingham via Unicode <[email protected]>: > Is there any reason why U+0310 COMBINING CANDRABINDU has scx=Inherited > rather than scx=Latn? The only language I've seen the character used > in is Sanskrit, and the only script I've seen it in is the Latin > script. > > Richard.
pgp0mBzA7K7wW.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
