On 8/14/2019 7:49 PM, James Kass via
Unicode wrote:
That may be the case for Marshallese. But
wouldn't surprise me. My comments were based on a different case of the same kinds of diacritics below (other languages) and at the time we consulted typographic samples including newsprint that were using pre-Unicode technologies. In that sense a cleaner case, because there was no influence by what Unicode did or didn't do. Now, having said that, I do get it that some materials, like text books, online class materials etc. need to be prepared / printed using the normative style for the given orthography. But it's a far cry from claiming that all text in a given language is invariably done only one way. A./ |
- Re: PUA (BMP) planned characters HTML ... James Kass via Unicode
- Re: PUA (BMP) planned characters H... Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: PUA (BMP) planned characters H... Andrew West via Unicode
- Re: PUA (BMP) planned characte... James Kass via Unicode
- Re: PUA (BMP) planned char... Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: PUA (BMP) planned... James Kass via Unicode
- Re: PUA (BMP) pla... Ken Whistler via Unicode
- Re: PUA (BMP) pla... Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: PUA (BMP) planned char... Asmus Freytag via Unicode
- Re: PUA (BMP) planned... James Kass via Unicode
- Re: PUA (BMP) pla... Asmus Freytag via Unicode
- RE: PUA (BMP) planned characters HTML table... Doug Ewell via Unicode