On 9/29/2019 7:42 AM, Andre Schappo via
Unicode wrote:
Or one could allow IDS to have leaf components that are any characters, not just ideographic characters, and then one could have all sorts of fun.I do like that ideaAndré Schappo That could be an appropriate extension for the kind of "grouping characters in an ideographic cell" that applies to examples like the *SQUARE TB. The outcome of that process is by definition
compatible for use with ideographs and not an open ended
compositional scheme. A./ |
- Aw: On the lack of a SQUARE TB glyph Marius Spix via Unicode
- Re: On the lack of a SQUARE TB glyph Ken Whistler via Unicode
- Re: On the lack of a SQUARE TB glyph Fred Brennan via Unicode
- Re: On the lack of a SQUARE TB gly... Fred Brennan via Unicode
- Re: On the lack of a SQUARE TB... James Kass via Unicode
- Re: On the lack of a SQUARE TB... Yifán Wáng via Unicode
- Re: On the lack of a SQUARE TB... Ken Whistler via Unicode
- Re: On the lack of a SQUARE TB gly... David Starner via Unicode
- Re: On the lack of a SQUARE TB... Julian Bradfield via Unicode
- Re: On the lack of a SQUAR... Andre Schappo via Unicode
- Re: On the lack of a ... Asmus Freytag via Unicode
- Re: On the lack of a SQUAR... Andre Schappo via Unicode
- Re: On the lack of a ... Asmus Freytag via Unicode
- Aw: Re: On the la... Marius Spix via Unicode
- Re: On the lack o... Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: On the lack of a SQUARE TB glyph Doug Ewell via Unicode
- Re: On the lack of a SQUARE TB glyph Doug Ewell via Unicode
- Re: On the lack of a SQUARE TB glyph Doug Ewell via Unicode