Ken Whistler wrote: > So, in general, no, you can *never* assume that once the UTC has just > approved a new character that it will be in the next version of > Unicode. I got quite a few messages like this when UTC approved the legacy computing characters in L2/19-025 last January. Great, that means I'll be able to start using and exchanging them in March, when Unicode 12.1 is released, right? Uh, no: 1. What Ken said above. 2. Unicode 12.1 was always just about the Reiwa sign. 3. Even when 13 comes out, fonts won't be immediately and magically updated to include them. -- Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org
- Will TAGALOG LETTER RA, currently in the p... Fred Brennan via Unicode
- Re: Will TAGALOG LETTER RA, currently... Markus Scherer via Unicode
- Re: Will TAGALOG LETTER RA, currently... Ken Whistler via Unicode
- Re: Will TAGALOG LETTER RA, curre... Ken Whistler via Unicode
- Re: Will TAGALOG LETTER RA, currently... Doug Ewell via Unicode
- Re: Will TAGALOG LETTER RA, curre... Rebecca Bettencourt via Unicode
- Re: Will TAGALOG LETTER RA, c... Fred Brennan via Unicode
- Re: Will TAGALOG LETTER R... Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: Will TAGALOG LETTER R... Ken Whistler via Unicode
- Re: Will TAGALOG LETTER R... Richard Wordingham via Unicode