Actually it's IBM that put this idea forward.
See http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/22052.html
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rev. Shamim Mohamed D.D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 7:19 PM
Subject: [Unicon-group] Respond to the W3C! Patents in protocols


> The W3C is now considering allowing patents to be part of standards,
> as long as they're "reasonable and non-discriminiatory". What's a
> "reasonable" royalty for, say, The Unicon Project, to pay Micros**t
> (per download) to implement a WWW protocol?
>  
> Read this:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-patentpolicy-comment/2001Oct/0189.html
>  
> And respond!
>  
> -s
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Unicon-group mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unicon-group


_______________________________________________
Unicon-group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unicon-group

Reply via email to