Marc Espie: > I will admit that the move of Unicon from Public Domain to GPL is > one major reason I don't contribute much (in fact, not at all > recently) to it.
It is inaccurate to speak of Unicon as "moving" from PD to GPL. As far as the outside world is concerned, Icon is PD; Unicon was born GPL. I wasn't aware that anyone had strong enough feelings about license issues to stop contributing; as far as I know this is the first open discussion there has been about the license to use. Until now the principal authors of the various pieces had an informal discussion and decided on the license. As I said, the differences are "currently" GPL. The fact that Clint raised this question on the list suggests strongly that this is open for discussion, eh? Any contributors (or would-be contributors) with strong opinions on licenses, please speak up! -s ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Unicon-group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unicon-group
