In my opinion there are far too many useful things that can be done with all the unreferenced variables/data structures.
While there is a possibility that a lightweight "microcontext" possibly might be a useful addition to the language, I like co-expressions exactly as they are. On Tue, 6 Apr 2004 22:05:36 -0400, "Frank J. Lhota" wrote: > > When an Icon or Unicon procedure creates a > co-expression, that co-expression > maintains a copy of all the dynamic local variables of > that procedure. > Clearly, it makes sense to include copies of the > dynamic variables actually > referenced by the co-expression, i.e. those dynamic > variable that actually > appear in the "create" expression. But does it make > sense for the > co-expression to include copies of dynamic variables > that are NOT > referenced? ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Unicon-group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unicon-group
