Good evening Clint, Clinton Jeffery wrote: > Hi Bruce, > > I am not wishing to dissuade you at all from Katadhin and PEGs. The YACC > family is definitely not amenable to > new grammar rules at runtime. If all you needed were new operators, one > would think that an extensible lexical > analyzer was all that you needed; the grammar can be written with terminal > symbols such as UNARY_OPERATOR > and BINARY_OPERATOR and so forth. > > Best regards, > Clint
I'll give this some thought. The problem may be amenable to the above solution. However, I am also looking at some alterations to Katadhin to be more Algol-like and less OO-like. Thanks for the input. I know I have asked this question of you before - Has there been any more thought to making the runtime system of Unicon more of a explicit VM? -- regards Bruce Rennie (God's Own Country Downunder) Warragul. Victoria. Australia. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Unicon-group mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unicon-group
