On 03/10/2013 08:20 PM, Clinton Jeffery wrote:
> At link time, one would know if one had linked in an override of a built-in 
> function, but you are right that at compile
> time, one doesn't know for sure so my suggestion was a warning. For that 
> matter, I would suggest a warning for your
> redefinition of move(), since other code that you have linked to might be in 
> for a nasty surprise if you redefine a
> built-in function in an incompatible way. But perhaps not everyone would like 
> me warning them of likely bugs, so either
> I should not add more of them, or perhaps I should make it easy to turn them 
> on or off.

I like the idea of turning them on and off.  It'd be nice to get warnings about 
redefinitions of functions,
but only when I want to see them!  Despite the facetious example I gave, I do 
sometimes redefine
functions as procedures, such as:

     procedure system(cmd)
         if \debug then write(cmd)
         proc("system")(cmd)
     end


-- 
Steve Wampler -- swamp...@noao.edu
The gods that smiled on your birth are now laughing out loud.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester  
Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the  
endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to 
tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Unicon-group mailing list
Unicon-group@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unicon-group

Reply via email to