BTW, I tried to use &parent ( the creator of ¤t vs the activator of
¤t in &source case ) and found out that we don't have such keyword.
I'm used to see it in the sources but realized that it is not exposed at
the language level. Quick search in my email revealed that Clint and I
discussed adding &parent at some point in time but we never did
materialize the idea.
--Jafar
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 11:49 PM, Jafar Al-Gharaibeh <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Oops! Thanks Steve. Attached is an updated version. The activation
> sequence looks like this:
>
> main => A => B => S
> S => B => A=> S
>
> At this point, S is done so it falls back to A
>
> A => main => B
>
> B is done, it goes back to main and the program exits.
>
> --Jafar
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Steve Wampler <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 02:05:08PM -0600, Jafar Al-Gharaibeh wrote:
>> > Art,
>> >
>> > I can confirm that this is a bug. In addition to testing your program, I
>> > also used the attached test with a "simpler" activation sequence.
>> >
>>
>> Hi Jafar,
>>
>> Are there missing activations in the code for S and B? (Between the
>> two "if" blocks.)
>>
>> Take care,
>> Steve
>>
>> --
>> Steve Wampler -- [email protected]
>> The gods that smiled on your birth are now laughing out loud.
>>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Unicon-group mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unicon-group
