Jean Boussier <[email protected]> wrote: > ivar: 20934740.7 i/s > attr: 18622122.9 i/s - 1.12x (± 0.00) slower > ivar:missing: 18408273.1 i/s - 1.14x (± 0.00) slower > > So yeah, the difference between raw @ivar and an attr_reader > is barely noticeable, and both are very fast.
I guess... I was wondering more in terms of the big picture with HTTP parsing, I/O, and response generation taken into account. (and there may be improvements in those areas later this year, assuming the world doesn't end sooner...) -- unsubscribe: one-click, see List-Unsubscribe header archive: https://yhbt.net/unicorn-public/
