> Ah, perhaps adding some checks to extconf.rb would be useful? > Or moving the ragel invocation into the extconf.rb-generated > Makefile? (not too sure how to do that...).
Not really no. And it would make ragel a build dependency. > I'm not remotely knowledgeable when it comes to bundler. That's fine, it just makes unicorn a bit harder to use outside of rubygems releases. But long story short bundler git gems is pretty much: - git clone repo - gem build repo.gemspec - gem install repo-... So nothing is executed besides the extconf.rb. Which mean the version file and the generated.c file would need to be committed in the repository rather than in .gitignore. But really I don't think so many people need to use unicorn branches. > OK, soon. Maybe with just the aforementioned ragel check above; > or not even... I'd say not even. It's just for people like me trying to run branches.
