commit 58a5982ec69fdb441435a539d240d08314d1b909
Author: Erez Zadok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:   Tue Dec 25 17:05:33 2007 -0500

    Unionfs: avoid using drop_pagecache_sb in remount
    
    Exporting drop_pagecache_sb to modules is somewhat risky because one cannot
    sleep inside invalidate_mapping_pages.  This could cause a lot of latency in
    the pre-emption code.  So don't export this symbol to minimize the risk that
    others will use it.
    
    Instead, unionfs will try to directly invalidate as many pages it can from
    the unionfs_remount code.  Invalidating those inode pages is not strictly
    required, but helpful in encouraging a revalidation of inodes sooner than
    waiting for individual f/s ops to access the union.  Since a remount is
    already an expensive but rare operation, this inode pages invalidation
    shouldn't add too much overhead.
    
    CC: Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    
    Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

diff --git a/fs/drop_caches.c b/fs/drop_caches.c
index 51baa6d..4e47623 100644
--- a/fs/drop_caches.c
+++ b/fs/drop_caches.c
@@ -3,7 +3,6 @@
  */
 
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
-#include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/mm.h>
 #include <linux/fs.h>
 #include <linux/writeback.h>
@@ -13,7 +12,7 @@
 /* A global variable is a bit ugly, but it keeps the code simple */
 int sysctl_drop_caches;
 
-void drop_pagecache_sb(struct super_block *sb)
+static void drop_pagecache_sb(struct super_block *sb)
 {
        struct inode *inode;
 
@@ -25,7 +24,6 @@ void drop_pagecache_sb(struct super_block *sb)
        }
        spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(drop_pagecache_sb);
 
 void drop_pagecache(void)
 {
diff --git a/fs/unionfs/dentry.c b/fs/unionfs/dentry.c
index 951ca07..fd7fdff 100644
--- a/fs/unionfs/dentry.c
+++ b/fs/unionfs/dentry.c
@@ -269,6 +269,17 @@ static inline void purge_inode_data(struct inode *inode)
                truncate_inode_pages(&inode->i_data, 0);
 }
 
+void purge_sb_data(struct super_block *sb)
+{
+       struct inode *inode;
+
+       list_for_each_entry(inode, &sb->s_inodes, i_sb_list) {
+               if (inode->i_state & (I_FREEING|I_WILL_FREE))
+                       continue;
+               purge_inode_data(inode);
+       }
+}
+
 /*
  * Revalidate a parent chain of dentries, then the actual node.
  * Assumes that dentry is locked, but will lock all parents if/when needed.
diff --git a/fs/unionfs/super.c b/fs/unionfs/super.c
index 01dc7f0..4902af6 100644
--- a/fs/unionfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/unionfs/super.c
@@ -704,29 +704,19 @@ out_no_change:
         */
 
        /*
-        * Now we call drop_pagecache_sb() to invalidate all pages in this
-        * super.  This function calls invalidate_inode_pages(mapping),
-        * which calls invalidate_mapping_pages(): the latter, however, will
-        * not invalidate pages which are dirty, locked, under writeback, or
-        * mapped into page tables.  We shouldn't have to worry about dirty
-        * or under-writeback pages, because do_remount_sb() called
-        * fsync_super() which would not have returned until all dirty pages
-        * were flushed.
-        *
-        * But do we have to worry about locked pages?  Is there any chance
-        * that in here we'll get locked pages?
-        *
-        * XXX: what about pages mapped into pagetables?  Are these pages
-        * which user processes may have mmap(2)'ed?  If so, then we need to
-        * invalidate those too, no?  Maybe we'll have to write our own
-        * version of invalidate_mapping_pages() which also handled mapped
-        * pages.
-        *
-        * XXX: Alternatively, maybe we should call truncate_inode_pages(),
-        * which use two passes over the pages list, and will truncate all
-        * pages.
+        * Once we finish the remounting successfully, our superblock
+        * generation number will have increased.  This will be detected by
+        * our dentry-revalidation code upon subsequent f/s operations
+        * through unionfs.  The revalidation code will rebuild the union of
+        * lower inodes for a given unionfs inode and invalidate any pages
+        * of such "stale" inodes (by calling our purge_inode_data
+        * function).  This revalidation will happen lazily and
+        * incrementally, as users perform operations on cached inodes.  We
+        * would like to encourage this revalidation to happen sooner if
+        * possible, so we try to invalidate as many other pages in our
+        * superblock as we can.
         */
-       drop_pagecache_sb(sb);
+       purge_sb_data(sb);
 
        /* copy new vectors into their correct place */
        tmp_data = UNIONFS_SB(sb)->data;
diff --git a/fs/unionfs/union.h b/fs/unionfs/union.h
index e701b39..fe11a23 100644
--- a/fs/unionfs/union.h
+++ b/fs/unionfs/union.h
@@ -373,6 +373,7 @@ extern int unionfs_rmdir(struct inode *dir, struct dentry 
*dentry);
 extern bool __unionfs_d_revalidate_chain(struct dentry *dentry,
                                         struct nameidata *nd, bool willwrite);
 extern bool is_newer_lower(const struct dentry *dentry);
+extern void purge_sb_data(struct super_block *sb);
 
 /* The values for unionfs_interpose's flag. */
 #define INTERPOSE_DEFAULT      0
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 7f58dc1..f0b135c 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -1062,7 +1062,6 @@ int drop_caches_sysctl_handler(struct ctl_table *, int, 
struct file *,
                                        void __user *, size_t *, loff_t *);
 unsigned long shrink_slab(unsigned long scanned, gfp_t gfp_mask,
                        unsigned long lru_pages);
-extern void drop_pagecache_sb(struct super_block *);
 void drop_pagecache(void);
 void drop_slab(void);
 
_______________________________________________
unionfs-cvs mailing list: http://unionfs.filesystems.org/
[email protected]
http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs-cvs

Reply via email to