Thank you for the patch. Jeff is planning to update the CVS 1.x release to 2.6.20.
BTW, the Unionfs 2.0 patches we have here work with 2.6.20: ftp://ftp.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/pub/unionfs/unionfs-2.x/ Erez. Thanks for the pointer to the Unionfs 2.0 patches. While I would rather avoid kernel patches in favor of external modules until now because the kbuild interface seems to be more predictable than the patch/diff "interface", at least in the case of Unionfs it seems like using patches could be the better way to go. Namely the last times I upgraded my kernel, the underlying kernel structures would always have changed that much so the module I had used before would break anyway. To minimize the impact, using patches would at least move the breakage from compile time to patch time... Isidor _______________________________________________ unionfs mailing list [email protected] http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
