In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Nielsen writes: > Erez, > I'm sorry to report that your patch didnt work. I applied it to > unionfs-2.1.10 and also tried unionfs-2.1.11. It appeared that the patch > was already applied to this version however. Neither versions solved my > problem. > > Were you able to reproduce the issue yourself?
Sorry, no. I tried everything I could to simulate your env, and several variations too, but I couldn't reproduce it. Any chance I can get temp remote access to your system? Since you're able to reproduce this reliably, that'd help a lot (my experience is that reproducing a kernel bug is >80% of the fix!) > Kind regards, > > John Thanks, Erez. _______________________________________________ unionfs mailing list: http://unionfs.filesystems.org/ unionfs@mail.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
