Erez Zadok wrote:
Paul, thanks for the unionfs-rt patch.
The one patch I put there is incremental: you first apply the basic unionfs
patch, and then the extra patch. I think this could be better, b/c the
extra patch is small enough and will likely apply cleanly even to other
kernel versions; in other words, we won't have to track so many RT patches
each time a new unionfs is released.
Good idea. I will try and test each unionfs patch as it is released
Paul
Cheers,
Erez.
_______________________________________________
unionfs mailing list: http://unionfs.filesystems.org/
unionfs@mail.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu
http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
_______________________________________________
unionfs mailing list: http://unionfs.filesystems.org/
unionfs@mail.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu
http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
