Hello Erez Thanks for your unionfs support. I really like unionfs and use it my my Centos 5.1 os.
Arun On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Paul Bender <peben...@san.rr.com> wrote: > Zitt Zitterkopf wrote: > >> Is UnionFS still alive and well? >> Haven't seen any traffic here in the mailing list for the last few months. >> Internally we have some linux .29 kernels which seem to have UNIONFS >> removed from the kernel - is this present at the main head or just some >> artifact of our internal linux development teams? >> > > Unionfs has not been included in the vanilla kernel and continues to be > patch. It appears that the kernel developers have a different idea on how > the stackable unification file system support should be implemented. > According to a recent thread on the Linux kernel mailing list, work is > finally underway on this different approach. > > Would the 19.rc-2 patches work against the latest *2.6.29.4* < >> http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/patch-2.6.29.4.bz2> release? >> > > In MiniMyth, I am using the unionfs 2.5.1 patch for 2.6.29-rc2 with > 2.6.29.4 and I have not had any problems. However, I do have a problem when > using it with 2.6.30-rc6. > > _______________________________________________ > unionfs mailing list: http://unionfs.filesystems.org/ > unionfs@mail.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu > http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs > -- Regards Arun Sharma 0-939-692-3118
_______________________________________________ unionfs mailing list: http://unionfs.filesystems.org/ unionfs@mail.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
