On 05/24/2012 06:20 PM, Marco Trevisan (Treviño) wrote: > 2012/5/24 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen <[email protected]>: >> On 05/23/2012 09:38 PM, Marco Trevisan (Treviño) wrote: >> Currently glib::Source is very simple and I've only designed it to >>> wrap the glib struct, but probably we could improve that also to be >>> reused. >> If we actually use that many you might try to reduce memory fragmentation by >> making the glib::Source class castable to a GSource (ie. by having a GSource >> value as the first member in the struct). Or if glib::Source is primarily >> stack allocated this doesn't matter, of course. > glib::Source's are mostly heap allocated... I could make them > wrappable to a GSource* with some changes, but is this really > improving a lot the things, construction and destruction of the > wrapper and the wrapped objects should mostly happen at the same time > there.
Note that GSources are ref-counted, so stack allocation is not possible really. It would be quite "interesting" to do a c++ wrapper with just one alloc (for one the class couldn't have any virtual members). -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~unity-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~unity-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
