As much as I disagree with Craig's views, I think it's good for us to confront them. Given that few on the list agree with Craig, it seems that he should be responding on a more frequent level to "offset" the hordes that disagree with him. Most of his posting seem to be in response to someone, so it doesn't seem like he's just spitting out postings.

At the same time I agree with Elisabeth, that it's more productive (and for some, less acid building) if the posting (on both side) remained more factual and less provoking.

Slash away my neighbors the day is still young,
Mr Rogers

Dubin, Elisabeth wrote:
Craig, with some due respect, you are shouting your manifestos into an ocean of people who not only largely disagree with you, but who fervently and passionately oppose most of what you are putting out here on the listserve, day after day. You cannot bend me to your mindset any more than I can bend you to mine, so I typically don't waste my time yelling at you on the listserve. You, practically alone on your hilltop, shouting into the blue, blue sea, are giving me a lot of acid in my stomach. Can you do me a favor and just cut down on the frequency of your dogmatic postings? It would save me a lot on my Tums bill. By the way, thanks for the advice about the tree thing.
*ELISABETH DUBIN*
*Hillier **ARCHITECTURE
*One South Penn Square, Philadelphia, PA 19107-3502 | T 215 636-9999 | F 215 636-9989 | hillier.com


------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Thursday, November 04, 2004 9:22 PM
*To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Subject:* Re: [UC] The Triumph of Moral Values -- Everyman's America


In a message dated 11/4/2004 7:11:17 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

But can't you just FOR ONCE not have to try to divide everybody up
and set up opposing sides?


After our recent extraordinary election, for a moment let me take off my rose colored glasses and my Cheshire cat grin.



The divisiveness continues on the part of the blues, unwilling to see reality. So, let us look at the election like a football game. The blues lost on the defensive side of the ball, the offensive side of the ball, and most importantly on the scoreboard.



The Democratic Party has been reduced from a national party to a regional party, yet allowed to participate in national governing. The blues now represent the Loony left coast, the liberal northeast coast, and the socialist leaning north central states.



For the arty or science oriented among you: Red is the color of richly oxygenated life giving blood. Blue is the color of blood and organs approaching failure.



No matter how you try to twist the statistics, and might I say without humor, the ordinary people of America soundly repudiated you blues. Never in my lifetime, in this country, has one political party so dominated all three branches of government.



May you be long to rail on Special K; do not let the wrongly self-anointed push you out into the cold wet unforgiving night.



Study the management methods of Ivan the Terrible or work to unite our precious nation: E Pluribus Unum.



Learn to think differently or die.



T
----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

Reply via email to