[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mr. Farrell, as far as whether or not UCHS "should" take a stand on Convention Hall, I believe that Ray Rorke, Andy Diller, Al Krigman, Brian Siano (Brian, I've included you here as you requested), Paul Uyehara, Monique Harvey - and even you! - have all demonstrated the tendency of certain members of this community to attack preservation issues and UCHS no matter what the organization does or doesn't do. So, as you say, you're probably better off going it alone in your preservation battle. Otherwise, they're likely to start attacking you. (My own opinion, not speaking on behalf of UCHS or anyone else, but spoken with frustration about the disingenuous nature and vehemence of some of the attacks.)
For the record, I haven't attacked preservation _issues_. I'm in favor of preservation. It's just that the HD a) is determined by a fundamentally undemocratic process, and b) places a greater burden of preservation upon homeowners rather than businesses and investment-property owners.
And I've been attacked by people in the UCHS-- enough to recognize that there are some genuine thugs in that bunch.)
---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
