Yes -- the point being that they are both wrong. Jonathan A. Cass -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Brian Siano Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 11:52 AM Cc: 'UnivCity@list.purple.com' Subject: Re: [UC] No Smoking Bill, White Dog & Abbraccio
Jonathan Cass wrote: > Hmm -- I don't mean to be harsh Naomi, but that sounds like a big fat > justification to me: "Hey, we treat our staff better than most other > restaurants so it is okay that we subject them to a known carcinogen." > > The White Dog permitting smoking is akin to a pharmacy selling cigarettes. Well, pharmacies _do_ sell cigarettes. Man, ever since the SATs dropped their "analogies" section, discourse has gone to hell. ---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>. ---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
