In a message dated 4/18/2007 9:00:26 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not really sure who wrote what in this exchange - when you add your response at the bottom instead of the top, it creates confusion - but if one or both of you contend that the vendors were evicted so that the landlord could lease to Dock Street, you've suggested that the contention is possible without demonstrating that it is what happened. In other words, if the point is that the arrival of Dock Street was the cause of the removal of the farmer's market, you'll need more than this. My point was that the fact that the Firehouse Market (with local businesses) closed and subsequently the owner rented to Dock Street (a local business) is inconsistent with the argument that someone has a plan to replace local businesses. Post hoc ergo propter hoc. Bruce McCullough ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
