I agree Lew. I now believe it was a combination, what percentage...
I am not sure.

My reason for posting the comment was to make aware neighbors
who are planning to replace their sidewalks or may have neighbors 
who are replacing sidewalks, of the dangers of..now..chopping roots 
and the lack of adequate water pits for trees.

I believe it is a zoning issue, particularly if a tree falls on a 
person or property such as houses or cars. I would hope the city
government would require specific dimensions for tree-pits based on the
scale of the tree if you apply for a permit to replace sidewalks. (but I
don't think so)

A form which says: 1)"are there trees on the sidewalk?", 2)"if so, how
many trees and what are the sizes?".

Now we have something valuable for the local zoning committees to look
at.

S

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lewis Mellman
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 11:03 AM
To: UnivCity@list.purple.com
Subject: Re: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street


     I heard the same explanation that Mike has for this from one of my 
local tree hugging friends.
Undersized tree pits/openings in pavement are a real problem for many
street 
trees because the roots need a border of permeable surface around the
trunk 
to absorb rain water.
     Drought periods like we often experience for much of July, August
and 
September many years also contribute to underwatering.  It's a good idea
to 
give mature trees supplemental watering during these times, because
often 
times a hard rain will not saturate the dry soil so that much of the
rain 
runs off without soaking in to the roots.  Newly planted trees need 
supplemental water for a few years because their roots systems tend to
be 
smaller than needed.  The green "Gator Bags" that we've been using in
Clark 
Park are a great and simple tool.  They also offer the trunks a little 
protection from dog pee and baby strollers.
     However, failure of anchoring roots that had been compromised by
root 
butchering from bad pavement work seems more likely to me than overall 
weakening of the tree from inadequate water for the loss of the tree
that 
Kyle photographed.
-Lew

Mike V. replied:

"I think it far more likely that the guys that did the sidewalk simply 
chopped through all of the tree roots on that side of the tree, thus 
destabilizing them and making them helpless to resist the high winds of
the 
storm.  This theory is supported by the fact that when the trees fell,
the 
roots that came up out of the ground on that side showed signs of
cutting, 
not tearing or snapping.  Also, the workers were seen by several local 
residents cutting through the trees, and when one raised a stability 
concern, the (presumed) foreman just shrugged it off.

- Mike V."

S-Ali wrote:

"So.I have a theory about what happened to the trees on the 4500 block
of 
Walnut Street which fell during the storm last week.
If I am not mistaken, the tree-pits where not adequate for the trees to 
receive water after the new sidewalk cement job was completed. I have
seen 
it happen in the past, older trees just fall over time from being
smothered 
by cement.
Opinions?
-S"


----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.




----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

Reply via email to