Glenn,
 Could you please explain what you mean by your words in context:
 
 1. tone
 2. code of silence (I understand this in police and mob contexts, but not here)
 3. the gang (who's in the gang, how do we know it exists, and does it meet?)
 4. ban
 
   "Some freely include tone, or breaking the code of silence if they wish to 
scold or ban someone from participating when he or she is outside the gang."
 Thanks,
 
 Paul
  
 -----Original Message-----
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; UnivCity@list.purple.com
 Sent: Wed, 16 May 2007 8:17 AM
 Subject: Re: [UC] Thanks for the emails, but really, all is well!
 
  ----- Original Message ----- From: "UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
 To: "University City List" <UnivCity@list.purple.com> 
 Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 1:18 PM 
 Subject: Re: [UC] Thanks for the emails, but really, all is well! 
 
 > 
 > I too am in favor of civility on the listserv and have previously pointed > 
 > out that ad hominem has no place in public discourse or rational debate. > 
 > still, ad hominem hasn't gone away, and now we get to see yet another form > 
 > of it: hand-picking which ad hominem messages are scolded and which ad > 
 > hominem messages are allowed. 
 > 
 > YOU GO, AD HOMINEM! 
 
 attacking an opponent's motives or character rather than the 
 policy or position they maintain : vicious ad hominem attacks. 
 2 relating to or associated with a particular person 
 
 
 Many people in the district ignore the real definition. Some freely include 
tone, or breaking the code of silence if they wish to scold or ban someone from 
participating when he or she is outside the gang. 
 
 Yet the posts of some folks are almost always ad hominem attacks. If they are 
in the "right thinking" gang, they will always get a free pass with this. 
 
 I have been accused of ad hominem attacks because of my tone and by "causing 
embarrassment" to civic association leaders when exposing specific problems. 
Sometimes the issue or problem would require that I name individuals. This is 
not the same as ad hominem attacks. Is this a mistake or a tactic? I wonder. 
 
 The same folks whom have lectured me and called my posts ad hominem have 
completely ignored the real ad hominem machine that is running all the time. 
 
 I know I got really frustrated, and believe it or not, had my feelings hurt 
when people could say that I was crazy, loony, evil, etc, etc while I was so 
often speaking about real and specific issues or problems. This double standard 
is so obvious to me. 
 
 Ray, I'm glad you brought this up on the list. Even though you haven't let out 
your anger about this, you get real ad hominem attacks aimed at you by Tony 
frequently. I believe this double standard has become completely accepted here 
in what Craig called the UCD culture. It exists in the rumor mill as well. 
 
 If you're a "right thinking" member of the district culture, you get a free 
pass because of the code of silence. If you're a leader in the UCD culture, you 
are almost expected to engage in ad hominem attacks against dissenting 
"outsiders." I've been evil, loony, etc long before I came to the list. 
 
 Questions, opinions, discussions of real issues are simultaneously an offense 
when "wrong thinking" people like me and apparently you post them. It's truly 
incredible to watch, and not so fun to receive. 
 
 So folks, get out the death ray! Crazy loony, evil, Moyer is at it again. 
 
 
 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > .................. 
 > UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN 
 > [aka laserbeam®] 
 > [aka ray] 
 > SERIAL LIAR. CALL FOR RATES. 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > ______________________________________________________________________ 
 > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. 
 > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email > 
 > ______________________________________________________________________ 
 > ---- 
 > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the 
 > list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see 
 > <http://www.purple.com/list.html>. 
 > 
 > 
 > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. 
 > Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: > 
 > 269.7.1/805 - Release Date: 5/15/2007 10:47 AM 
 > 
 > 
 ---- 
 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the 
 list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see 
 <http://www.purple.com/list.html>. 
   
________________________________________________________________________
AOL now offers free email to everyone.  Find out more about what's free from 
AOL at AOL.com.

Reply via email to