Thanks--I hope the discussion here will get more attention for the park and
those who care for it!

Melanie Lamond did ask for your name, but having posted your email address,
that's probably enough for her to look it up, and you needn't post it in
public here anyway.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2007 4:31 PM
To: Univcity
Subject: [UC] Clearing the air a little



There have been a couple of concerns raised on the list about two websites
that
I administer--malcolmxpark.org and malcolmxpark.info-- so I thought it would
probably behoove me to dispel any misconceptions.  I have lived on 51st St.
facing Malcolm X Park since 2003, and I've been a member of the Friends of
Malcolm X Park since late 2005.  In that time, I've gotten more involved in
the
neighborhood and more interested in the activities going on in the park.
During
the winter, I proposed starting a website at one of the Friends meetings,
but
since I am the only member with regular computer access, the inclination and
the ability to put such a thing together, the group left it up to me
entirely. 
Initially I registered malcolmxpark.org and planned to use it as an official
site for the Friends group, and in fact, in its earliest iteration, the
static
pages currently on the .info site were on the .org site.  Subsequently, over
the last month, I've found that I wanted to write about a much broader range
of
topics, some of which would be of little or no interest to the Friends
group.  I
had already grown somewhat uncomfortable with the way the .org site mixed my
own
editorializing with official Friends content, and I had resolved to
distinguish
the two by establishing the .info site as the official site.  When the
UCD/Fenton/Rally story broke, that took on a new urgency, especially when
malcolmxpark.org was described by ABCnews as "the park's own site."  I
hastily,
and partially,  re-assembled the official site at .info and put the
disclaimer
on the .org site that it was a personal site.  Since the .org site is my own
creation and includes some editorial content, it is unfair to hang my
judgments
on the Friends group as a whole, but it is entirely my fault that readers
got a
mistaken impression of the site.  I inadvertantly represented MY views as
those
of the group.  Thus, the only conspiracy is one hatched on my own behalf to
save
myself the embarrassment of purporting to represent the entire Friends
organization.  And now, all ham-fisted, I've gone and messed that up too.

Regarding the controversial events, here's what I wrote in a post on the
.org
site:

"As to the original post in question, I wrote it and posted the video just
one
day after the event transpired and before any subsequent questions were
raised.
I described the event as a political rally because, as an observer in the
park
that day, it appeared to me to be a political rally. But that was my
judgment
as an observer and mine alone."

Beyond this opinion based on my attendance at the event, I have no inside
information from the Friends group, and I have no connection to the
councilwoman or UCD.  I certainly wish that I could resolve, one way or the
other, the question of whether there was wrongdoing on the part of anyone
involved with this event, but without more information, I simply cannot.

Anyway, on the positive side, malcolmxpark.org has been getting a lot more
attention and seems to have developed a regular readership.  If you know of
a
story that you'd like to see get more attention, let me know.  This weekend,
I've got a brief story and a video interview with members of the Eastwick
Bike
Patrol.  Talk about an organization that needs more exposure!  I hope you'll
check it out.

http://malcolmxpark.org/?p=101

Andrew


----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

Reply via email to