Bill Sanderson wrote:
You're right, I guess. They had an incident which involved personnel policies--did an employee do the right (or the wrong) thing. No organization I've ever run into is going to handle such a thing in public--would you expect there to be broad neighborhood publicity if this were you, and your employer?
yes, penn does handle this kind of thing -- look at the amy gutmann holloween incident. it broke out on someone's blog (not the newspapers), spread throughout the media, and penn very quickly issued a statement and posted it on their website. it was the right thing to do, the responsible thing to do.
Presumably, at some point, John Fenton's employment status will change--he'll go back to work, or otherwise. Whether anyone will announce that to the world, I don't know, but I don't expect to see it emblazoned on any headlines.
see, that's just it: all we've heard thus far (publicly) is headlines. meanwhile some in the neighborhood have heard wendell deliver a statement at a meeting, and the daily news has shifted the 'story' (removing/distancing fenton and magnifying blackwell) while not publishing ucd's full official statement...
up next: more headlines?... .................. UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN [aka laserbeam®] [aka ray] SERIAL LIAR. CALL FOR RATES. ---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
