From: "Glenn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "KAREN ALLEN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<UnivCity@list.purple.com>
Subject: Re: [UC] The UCD Board and community reps
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 13:20:50 -0400
I'm sorry Karen. One other question.
You mentioned the discussion about "better to have a seat at the table" I
find it odd but understandable. Was there any suggestion that UCD would
deny you a seat at the table if you just gave them one CPN choice?
If you can recall, why did CPN board members have that suspicion?
Glenn
The general understanding, both in the UCCC debate of the issue, and with
CPN, was that we had to send three nominees. I don't know whether there was
ever any explicit statement from UCD that sending one would result in
denial, but that was definitely inferred from UCD's insistence to have three
nominees.
To answer your other question, it was the CPN Board, not the membership, who
did then, and does now vote on issues concerning the organization. The
membership elects the Board, and the Board, in turn, acts on the
membership's behalf. So yes, the Board was making the decision to not send
just one, to send three, and who the three would have been.
Karen Allen
----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
