--- Wilma de Soto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I should think THEY should have been the major > opposition to the proposed > hotel project and NOT Karen Allen or Glenn Moyer. Wilma, Yes indeed, that is a very excellent point! Check this out. This was in the UC Review: "'I wanted to get it de-listed to have greater choices,' explained Lussenhop of his motion to rescind designation. 'But once I realized the sentiment of the historical committee and neighborhood, I said fine...'" Either Mr. Lussenhop is doing some serious astroturfing or this "neighborhood" character was involved since before the de-listing request which was turned down on July 13! Then in the last paragraph of the article: "In a letter. committee chair Barry Grossbach stated that, while the committee has met with Lussenhop, 'there is no zoning application on file for this property'" I wonder if Barry knows who this character, "neighborhood," is. Barry is the only known person to have met with Lussenhop based on the news report. I just wonder when exactly did SHCA and UCHS first learn about this hotel plan? They would have certainly, immediately, let the larger real neighborhood know; had they known Lussenhop was asking to get permission back before July 13, which would have permitted demolition? Am I not correct about this?????? Glenn PS I don't think Mike V. liked my parody, hehehe > > http://www.uchs.net/ > > With this link you may read about the UCHS and SHCA > Historic District. > > Very well. Glenn may have raised several questions > in response to Karen > Allen's letter. > > Still, if there has been a threat to the historical > integrity of our area, > the UCHS and the SHCA were always quite vocal in > opposition. > > Why not now? > > > > > On 10/19/07 1:57 PM, "Mike V." > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Let's have a quick review on definitions and > accuracy in correspondence, > > shall we? > > > > Glenn does not equal "the community", though I > suspect that inside his > > own head he is indeed a multitude. > > > > He certainly did not write this letter on my > behalf. > > > > - Mike V. > > > > ---- > > You are receiving this because you are subscribed > to the > > list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for > archive information, see > > <http://www.purple.com/list.html>. > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
