[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This issue of "standing" is important in zoning matters, of course. In this case, I believe that an extended geographical radius is appropriate because Penn's history shows that a precedent may be set if the variance in question were allowed, which affects a broad area of West Philadelphia.



not only that, but shca called this meeting, and barry grossbach wrote that "neighbors will have a full opportunity to ask questions and offer comments about the project, and the committee will take all comments into consideration in its deliberations.... please feel free to share this information with anyone who might be interested." this is in accordance with shca's zoning committee's mission statement:

Zoning

Spruce Hill's zoning committee provides a forum for
community response to pending requests for changes in
zoning classifications on existing structures, and to
impact new developments that require zoning variances for
land use and/or density. The committee approves
guidelines that establish precedents for the committee to
follow in addressing specific kinds of cases. Zoning
represents an indispensable tool for community control
over development within its neighborhood boundaries.

Our primary goal is the retention of single-family
housing in Spruce Hill, and the conversion of existing
multi-family housing to owner-occupancy. Given that so
much of Spruce Hill’s population is composed of renters
and transients, the emphasis on retaining and expanding a
home-owning base is critical for the neighborhood’s
advancement and progress and stability. For information,
contact Barry Grossbach.


* * * * * * *


bear in mind that none of the neighbors would have to stand up and speak about this in the first place, if uchs and shca had rejected, outright, the hotel proposal when they first learned about it (prior to the october 2007 article). if uchs was truly committed to preservation it would have rejected an 11-story hotel which is so out of character with the surrounding blocks and attached to a 3 story historic mansion, leaving the mansion in permanent shadow; if shca was truly committed to retaining single-family housing and converting multi-family housing to owner-occupancy, it would have rejected an 11-story hotel to be built where it is.

are shca or uchs committed to this neighborhood? to its neighbors? at what point will we know that they are?



..................
UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN





































































----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

Reply via email to