More on response to DHS

http://www.philly.com/philly/hp/news_update/20080806_Nutter_seeks_to_reassure_DHS_workers.html


I agree, Nutter should apologize to all of us.  Note the experienced workers 
response, "nothing will change."


I wasn't clear yesterday about the effect of poor simplistic evaluation.  
Teachers are being forced to teach to the standardized test.  It's frustrating 
to give up everything else because this focus is demanded.   In substance abuse 
programs, therapists are forced to treat paperwork instead of people.  

This system glorifies a top down approach.  Bean counters in far away places 
can evaluate the paperwork with a checklist.  No one cares about the therapists 
continuing improvement as a therapist or what they are doing with the patient.  
Then front line workers are treated like idiots when they complain that the 
evaluations and paperwork focus is counterproductive.  They know they don't 
have the tools they need for the human service and the paperwork focus is all 
designed to monitor them- checklists, etc.

Statistics are being overused and overvalued in the human services evaluations. 
 It's like glorifying the hammer so much that the carpenter is forgotten.  That 
is not an anti-statistic sentiment, but the belief that statistics is merely a 
tool.  The overuse of statistics in evaluation is because of the top down 
nature of these systems.  Front line therapists having proper supports and 
tools are irrelvant because we have a few great men to pass judgement. 

Evaluations should be on-going and multi-dimensional.  Monitoring minimum 
standards must not be the entire focus.  Professional development should be 
encouraged as part of the job and then the evaluation becomes tied to 
development not just as the basis for reprimands.

Failings like the massive failing at DHS would not happen and the agencies and 
professionals could function at a much higher level and provide tremendous 
benefit to society.  It is not a waste to develop good agencies with growing 
high functioning professionals!

Glenn








----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

Reply via email to