“(but unfortunately, since the PCPC hearing minutes do not include the text of 
what the witnesses said, that's not readily apparant to those who were not in 
attendance).”


Karen,

You brought up a very important matter for all Philadelphians.  Yesterday, I 
was so livid to read the suggestion that SHCA  and UCHS leaders were being 
"smart" and "moral."  But their pathetic scheming seems petty compared to this 
issue you raise!

This Campus Inn struggle has serendipitously uncovered the foundation of the 
pay to play system of Phila. corruption.  I have attended 2 PHC hearings and 2 
PCPC hearings which bared the system.    

It is truly mind boggling that the commissioners of these commissions can week 
after week approve false records of their official proceedings.  These 
commissions have tremendous power to affect the lives and communities of all 
Philadelphians.

The commissions do not allow citizens to independently make recordings of 
official public hearings.  They claim interchangeably to produce either 
“minutes” or “transcripts” as the reason citizen journalists may not make 
independent recordings of hearings.  They mask the false records to look like 
transcripts so that the appearance is that the hearing was a routine 2-3 minute 
session.

These false records are produced by the lower level secretaries for these 
commissioners.  These secretaries work under these bosses 5 days a week so 
editing out everything that does not support the commission staff goals is a 
natural phenomena when accountability and truth have no importance.

But why do the commissioners approve this system?

When the PHC overturned the rejection of its architects and approved the 
obviously predetermined commitment to approve the Campus Inn, it was obvious to 
anyone in attendance as it would be to anyone reading accurate transcripts!  
After witnessing these shenanigans, I read the “minutes/transcripts” from the 
architectural committee.  (Remarkably they weren’t available to the public 
prior to the November meeting at which the prearranged approval was granted.)

Every single bit of important information, both testimony from the development 
team and testimony from the public, was missing!  Every single bit!

As you point out, the hour of testimony from the public at the PCPC was 
completely removed too.  The picture anyone would draw from reading the 
“minutes” from that meeting would be completely wrong.

This system, falsifying records, cries out to developers to cut back room 
deals.  It completely shields any agency staff from appearing to be involved 
with backroom deals as their co-workers do the editing.  The people assembled 
at the November PHC meeting could not know the details of the backroom deals 
but could feel the tremendous feeling of helplessness under the yoke of a 
corrupt government.

If the public and journalists had access to accurate and honest transcripts, 
the fact that backroom dealing had obviously occurred would be reflected in 
those transcripts too. All Philadelphians could see what their government is up 
to and not just those in attendance! 

It seems ridiculous to have any hope for an honest responsible government if 
the people don’t stand up to this system.  The Deputy mayor, Altman, and PCPC 
Director, Greenberger and the PHC commissioners have been approving these false 
records.  

This gang style protectionism of their part of a corrupt system needs to be 
addressed by the people or it is going to continue!

Thanks for bringing this up,
Glenn



----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

Reply via email to