A bizarrely garbled post.

No Rec centers are "set to close." The Mayor's plans are quite clear on that point. Closures of icerinks and pools have been scheduled, but Nutter and Rec Commissioner Susan Slawson are leaving every Rec center open.

When Rec centers were "reviewed and found to have serious problems," Nutter's actual response was to vow to restore a capital-projects budget to Rec. Across every branch of City government, capital-project exemptions are specifically exempted from Nutter's emergency budget.

This is a striking and significant characteristic of his thinking. Whenever governments (or businesses) run into a bad budget patch, their first impulse is to put off construction or repairs. This has been going on, in fact, more often than not since the 1970s.

Rather like Obama -- but earlier -- Nutter has been insistent this gambit is exhausted as of 2008. After a while, things fall apart and need to be replaced or rebuilt. If you fail, you don't save money, you just lose more money in the next budget cycles.

-- Tony West


Yes!  This was exactly the way the library and rec centers were set to close.  
The recession seems to be for Nutter buddies what 9/11 was for the Iraq war.

For example, the 10 year tax abatement to transfer tax revenues to corporate developers 
is sacrosanct.  But ending forever, the most important public spaces is to be swallowed 
whole without consideration.  With Nutter's indignation, the people are supposed to 
blindly trust the administration when they use invalid comparisons (to cities designed 
for cars with funded school libraries) to justify the closings while they say "end 
of discussion."

A clue: When the Rec centers were reviewed and found to have serious problems, Nutter's response was to start closing them.
He needs a Department of Homeland Corporate Buddies.

Glenn


----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

Reply via email to