I'm not "afraid".
I'm annoyed.
There's a difference.


-cm
`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·...¸><((((º>

On Jan 7, 2009, at 12:01 PM, <just...@ucr.edu> wrote:

The government (and it isn't one "Big Brother" sitting in a dark room watching your every move) has already won. It has you afraid, even afraid of street signs and television. You are a perfect citizen in a dictatorship. Afraid all the time (or having that "feeling"). They don't need guns. hey just need to give you "the feeling."

Why not stop being afraid of "them," the amorphous "State" which looms large in your imagination, and start watching them? Be a gov't watchdog and they will start to be afraid of you! Then you can report the "suspicious activity" of different gov't agencies and employees (most of whom are just normal people trying to make a living too).

Just in fun:)
jm
______________
Dr. Justin McDaniel
Dept. of Religious Studies
3046 INTN
University of California, Riverside
Riverside, CA 92521
951-827-4530
just...@ucr.edu


---- Original message ----
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 08:55:44 -0500
From: Cindy Miller <c...@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [UC] Antenna?  We love the Digital box
To: univcity@list.purple.com

  I'm not real comfortable about the privacy issues--
  however not being a Constitutional scholar or a
  lawyer or anything--I can't put my argument into
  flowing prose.
  But something about it just doesn't feel right. Like
  cameras at stoplights, or in elevators--or
  Ez-Pass--the argument that "well, you're not doing
  anything wrong, so why should it bother you" just
  isn't gettin' it for me....(The worst is a flashing
  sign on 38 in Jersey that tells you to "REPORT
  SUSPICIOUS BEHAVIOR")
  Wish I were better able to put words to this
  nagging feeling....



  -cm
  `·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·...¸><((((º>
  (Topic not suitable for UC Listserve?)

  On Jan 6, 2009, at 3:13 PM, Brian Siano wrote:

    campio...@juno.com wrote:

      Separately, my husband was one of the first to
      send for the coupon to buy the digital box.  I
      think that when he did it, they were giving two
      $40 coupons per family and also that there was
      some earl bird special so that the boxes were
      only $40 each.  So..  we got a box, for our 22
      year old TV, for the cost of S&H.  We do NOT
      have cable, but with the box, many of our
      stations now come in at cable quality.  This is
      great.  No monthly cost and we are already
      enjoying the benefit of much improved reception
      and additional local channels.  So far, there
      are only two down sides.  My favorite station
      was 12 and now it often reads "weak signal".
      (It is the only station that is worse than
      before.)   Second: When it is very windy,
      sometimes the signal breaks for a second or two,
      and there are weird skips or distortion on the
      screen.  This seems a small price to pay for
      the loss of fuzz and buzz.  There is a third
      thing that makes me a little nervous.  The
      Digital box turns itself off when there are no
      adjustments to sound or channel for a long
      period of time.  This might be very good for
      those who want to conserve energy or are using
      the TV as a sedative and become too tired to
      turn it off, but it seems to me as if someone
      could gather data on individuals and on
      populations, regarding what we watch, when we
      watch it, and when most of us are vulnerably
      asleep.  But, I figure the Advertisers are
      probably more of a nuisance than Big Brother
      when it comes to TV and eventually I'll get a
      newer TV and maybe even T-Vo(sp?).

    Liz, I have TiVo . It is truly the Box of the
    Gods.
    If you're concerned about 'big brother," you won't
    like it. Because it does transmit your viewing
    preferences back to TiVo Central so it can suggest
    programs that you might like. My suggestion? Stop
    worrying about Big Brother, because it's just
    silly. For one thing, what is broadcast on TV
    that's so compromising? _This Old House_?
    _Frontline_? The Chomsky lecture on WYBE? For
    another, let's say there is something on TV that's
    politically odd or "suspect." Why should I let
    fear affect what I want to watch? That just
    invites the censor within, the decision to _not_
    watch or read something because of the fear, which
    is more effective than anything the GuvMint can
    do.
    And if you're worried about the TiVo people using
    the data to market stuff to you... well, I haven't
    noticed any severe intrusions into my personal
    life, and I've had TiVo for nearly ten years. And
    if they market stuff at me, well, I just don't buy
    it.
    ----
    You are receiving this because you are subscribed
    to the
    list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for
    archive information, see
    <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

Reply via email to