At the risk of getting you started again (not that I dont sometimes
agree with you; it's just the lengthy explications and over-the-top
lengths to which you carry them....)
Heaven forbid that they ask people around the park for their opinions
about the park and how its use impacts them! I understand that we
shouldn't be restricting people's access to public spaces and their
right to free speech but there are limits long recognized by the law
and common sense. It's one thing to play music I don't like but it's
another to burn a cross (actually, I'm not sure the law does see these
as essentially different, but I think you get my point.) I believe I
can trust my neighbors (using the term loosely) to recognize and
accept reasonable use of the park, and that if a line comes close to
being crossed, that others of my neighbors will speak up.
- Ricky
On Sep 22, 2009, at 7:40 PM, Glenn moyer <[email protected]> wrote:
Dear community,
The excellent FOCP has a new, highly sophisticated, survey
instrument designed to discover the good wishes of good neighbors.
Which bad groups should the FOCP policy comandantes kick out of
Clark Park and send to Malcolm X park this year? The enquiring
minds of FOCP leaders want to know!
The principal investigator and lead author of the survey instrument
is none other than that illustrious, larger than life, permanent
board member, and chief committee bloviater, Tony W. Bigwind! He
and his assistant, Frank Privatizeparks, uncloaked the expertly
administered scientific research formality last week, before an
assembled crowd of bad people.
Why waste time with valid research when FOCP already knows the best
of all possible truths? Let’s not be silly and waste the time of go
od volunteers!
If only Fox news had researchers like T.W. Bigwind and
Privatizeparks, we’d have a Rush/Beck administration in the White ho
use now!
Thumbing their protuberances at the freedom of assembly doctrines
established over the past two centuries, what does FOCP care if city
tax payers defend against a first amendment lawsuit? These FOCP
researchers want the good truth, and as far as they’re concerned, th
e loony leftists can shove their precious first amendment up their a
…(censored for civility)! [But please, only shove the constitution
after obtaining the proper permits from the department of recreation.]
At the assembly of bad people, Tony W. Bigwind was magnificent as he
explained the erudition, statistical absolutisms, and socio-economic
ego stratification parameters of the research to the bewildered
audience. Not a single soul understood the brilliant brilliance
from Bigwind except Bigwind himself!
It seems that only good people, trained by experts of the American
Association of the Scientifically Anointed, can administer the
excellent survey to prevent unanticipated contamination of the
research proof. All of you little folks will certainly understand;
the overwhelming research evidence will soon prove that good FOCP
comandantes have no rules above them. Rules are for those the
comandantes don’t like, and as everyone knows, excellent FOCP survey
s simply prove that this is absolutely positively fact!
Tony W. Bigwind and Frank Privatizeparks want good facts! Nothing
but the good truth and the good facts! FOCP surveys rule!
Glenn
PS: Sincerely, the use of permits in the city of Philadelphia needs
to be clarified and challenged in court. In the United States of
America, use permits are intended as a system for reserving public
space for a special purpose. It is not considered by the US Supreme
court, over the centuries, to be a tool for a powerful UCD backed,
ruthless association, to discriminate against others, so that they
have monopoly use over public parks! Rules and permit restrictions
in the civilized world, beyond Clark Park, are for everyone or no
one! We need to consider how FOCP leaders attempt to monopolize and
dictate the use of Clark Park, instead of giving them more money and
power as they always demand!
----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
