Tony,

That's wonderful to hear - and I would assume the end result is a better park 
that gets more use. I disagree more so with the immense public expenditure on a 
park that I, at least, view as pretty darn nice, considering the state of most 
of this city. But yes, you are correct, if the money is going to get spent 
anyway, it's up to the neighborhood to get what it can. And no, the 
neighborhood shouldn't avoid solely out of fear of gentrification, but should 
be aware that there are people out there (in general) who intentionally or not 
push for changes.

Darco

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-univc...@list.purple.com [mailto:owner-univc...@list.purple.com] On 
Behalf Of Anthony West
Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2010 3:21 PM
To: UnivCity listserv
Subject: Re: [UC] Clark Park: Power and secrecy was the goal, UCR

  A half-hour ago, on a cool, gray fall afternoon, I observed 15 inner-city 
kids playing on the new basketball court, 12 kids playing on the new older-kids 
playground, 6 kids playing on the new totlot -- all fruits of the Clark Park 
Revitalization Plan. Different people hold different priorities, but in 
general, I don't think it's wasteful to direct a little public investment 
toward inner-city kids every 40 years or so.

I never ask strange children if they are gentry or not, but I also saw no 
evidence today that certain people have, in fact, been pushed out of the park, 
just because it's been improved. My friends in the Woodland Avenue Reunion like 
the way the park has been upgraded. A better park attracts people from all over 
West Philadelphia, every day.

Completely "ungentrified" West Philadelphia neighborhoods, like those around 
Clara Muhammad Park and Carroll Park, have also lobbied successfully for public 
investments in these public spaces in recent years. Should our neighborhood 
avoid doing likewise, solely out of fear of committing gentrification?

-- Tony West


> Lalevic, Darco wrote:
>> I disagree with the entire Clark Park revitalization plan. I think 
>> it's wasteful at the least, and at worse, part of an effort to "clean 
>> up" the park to make it more appealing to the gentrification of the 
>> neighborhood and push certain people out.
>

----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." 
To unsubscribe or for archive information, see 
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

Reply via email to