Right on Glenn!
On Mar 27, 2013, at 7:58 AM, Glenn moyer wrote:

> From the Guardian:
> 
> "One very common tactic for enforcing political orthodoxies is to malign the 
> character, "style" and even mental health of those who challenge them. The 
> most extreme version of this was an old Soviet favorite: to declare political 
> dissidents mentally ill and put them in hospitals..."
> 
> 
> "...But what is at play here is this destructive dynamic that the more one 
> dissents from political orthodoxies, the more personalized, style-focused and 
> substance-free the attacks become. That's because once someone becomes 
> sufficiently critical of establishment pieties, the goal is not merely to 
> dispute their claims but to silence them. That's accomplished by demonizing 
> the person on personality and style grounds to the point where huge numbers 
> of people decide that nothing they say should even be considered, let alone 
> accepted. It's a sorry and anti-intellectual tactic, to be sure, but a 
> brutally effective one"
>  
>  
> Everyday, there are important specific issues to bring to an informed 
> citizenry in the neighborhood.  So why is this Glenn Greenwald analysis the 
> most important topic for people to consider here in the upscale UCD village?  
> Why are neighbors so terrified to engage in meaningful discussion about the 
> power structures transforming the neighborhood, city , and country into an 
> inverted totalitarian corporate state???  Is it only the censorship 
> exemplified by UCneighbors, founded by the University of Pennsylvannia, which 
> causes the silence of locals?
>  
> I remember finding it amazing that neighbors would silently watch me face 
> year's of personal attacks, while "community leaders" would never ever refute 
> the truths I brought to the public!
>  
>  
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/mar/23/noam-chomsky-guardian-personality
> ---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named 
> "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see .

Reply via email to